Case LawHigh Court › Ita/377/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of I...

Ita/377/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bangalore International

High Court 19 Sep 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/377/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bangalore International
Date of order
19 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/377/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bangalore International, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.For the reasons stated in ITA No.329/2017, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2017 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIT(A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. CIRCLE-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI.,ADVOCATE) AND: M/S BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., ADMINISTRATION BLOCK, BIAL, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560300. PAN:AABC 8973D. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.T. SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27/09/2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.510/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ETC. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned advocates on both sides submit that the questions raised in this appeal, are identical to the one in ITA No.329/2017. Their submission is placed on record. 2.For the reasons stated in ITA No.329/2017, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan