Ita/380/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Agnus Holdins Pvt Ltd
High Court
01 Oct 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/380/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Agnus Holdins Pvt Ltd
Date of order
01 Oct 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/380/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Agnus Holdins Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF OCTOBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
LT.A. NO.380 OF 2013
BEI|WEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE.
2).THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIRCLE-11(1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVANNRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.|NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.|
... APPELLANTS
(BY Mr. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)
AND
M/S. AGNUS HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,STAR II, OPP: IIMB, BILEKAHALLIBANNERGHATTA MAIN ROADBANGALORE-5600 /6.
~.. RESPONDENT|
(BY Ms. PRATHIBHA R, ADV., FOR-
Mr. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.,)
THIS IJ§.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OI.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28-03-2013|
PASSED IN ITA NO.941/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2007-08, PRAYING TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN.»
I]. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSEDBY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.941/BANG/2011—DATED 28-03-2013 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE!APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER!PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,|CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Smt.PrathibaR.,|jiearnedcounsel]for
Mr.S.Parthasarathi, learned counsel for the assessee.
2. Learned counsel! for the assessee submits tnatthe tax effect in this appeal is less than41 Crore andtherefore, the appeal may not be maintainable in view ofthe Circular No.1/7/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for therevenue submits that he be granted liberty to revive the
appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptionsunder the aforesaid Circular dated 08.08.2019.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the appeal
is disposed of with liberty as prayed for by the learned
counse|l for the revenue
RV|
Sd/-JUDGESd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.