Case Law › High Court › Ita/38/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/38/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri. S.kumara Pillai

High Court 18 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

18 Sep 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/38/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri. S.kumara Pillai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Theabove Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY ,THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 27TH BHADRA, 1940 ITA.No. 38 of 2008 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 306/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 27-06-2003 APPELLANT: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI PKR MENON SR COUNSEL SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/S: SRI. S.KUMARA PILLAICHEMPAKA BHAVAN, THAMARAKULAM, KOLLAM.BY ADVS.SMT.S.HEMALATHASRI.KMV.PANDALAI THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Permission granted. Theabove Income Tax Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/-ASHOK MENONJUDGEAPPENDIXPETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 18/01/2000.ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX DATED 08/06/2001.ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 27/06/2003.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.