Case Law › High Court › Ita/38/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (I...

Ita/38/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation-1) v. Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company Ltd

High Court 14 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

14 Jan 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/38/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation-1) v. Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the present appeal is hereby dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

0/0 14.01.2011 Present: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel wt'l Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anish KapT, Advocate for the respondent. +ITA Nos. 31, 32, 35-40/2011 * We find today that only issue which is raised b: ':h:: Department in these cases pertains to charging of interest undEr Section 2348 of the Income Tax Act, in view of the assessee's in:oT 2 being subjected to TDS. As far as this question is concerned, it already s·:an: s decided by the judgment of this Court dated 30[th ]August, 201C L1 a batch matter, the lead case being Director, Income Tax v= M.s Mitsubishi in ITA No. 491 of 2008, in favour of the assessee. Accordingly, the present appeal is hereby dismissed. JANUARY 14, 2011 ftK M.L. MEHTA.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.