Case LawHigh Court › Ita/38/2017 Of M/S Ensco Maritime Ltd v....

Ita/38/2017 Of M/S Ensco Maritime Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Ita/38/2017 Of M/S Ensco Maritime Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/38/2017 Of M/S Ensco Maritime Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the present appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 38 of 2017 09[th] APRIL, 2021 Between: M/s Ensco Maritime Ltd. …Appellant and Deputy Director of Income Tax. …Respondent Counsel for the appellant. :Mr. P.R. Mullick and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondent. :Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel. The Court made the following : JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan) Mr. P.R. Mullick, the learned counsel for the appellant, informs this Court that the appellant-assesse has already filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Therefore, he wishes to withdraw the present appeal. 2. Hence, the present appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn. 3. No order as to costs. 4. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any, stands disposed-of. _____________________________ RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt: 09[th] APRIL, 2021 Rahul
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan