Ita/384/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mini Ramankutty
High Court
22 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/384/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mini Ramankutty
Date of order
22 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/384/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mini Ramankutty, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 384 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1041/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT.
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/ASSESSEE.
-----------------------------------
MINI RAMANKUTTY,
PROP: M/S. GOPURATHINGAL EXPORTS, PALLURUTHY NADA,
COCHIN - 682 006.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal No.384 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
At the request of counsel for the appellant appeal isdismissed as withdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claimeligible refund of court fee.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue