Ita/386/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Deepak Cables (I) Ltd
High Court
17 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/386/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Deepak Cables (I) Ltd
Date of order
17 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/386/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Deepak Cables (I) Ltd, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: In view of the said subsequent.events, the orders passed by the Iribunal as well asthe First Appellate Authority are unsustainable.Therefore, the impugned orders passed by theTribunal and the First Appellate Authority are lableto be set aside and the matter requires to be remittedto the First Appell...
Decision: Accordingly, we pass the following: 4 ORD BER The appeal is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THER 1 DAY OF OCTOBER 2014
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. KUMAR
ANT)
THR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B. MANOHAR
1.T.A. NO.386/2008
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE,C R BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE |
2. THR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF.INCOME TAX.CIRCLE 2(1), C R BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE ©... APPELLANTS(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND:M/S. DEEPAK CABLES (I) LTD.,NO.313, EMBASSY CENTRE3 FLOOR, NO.11, |CRESCBNT ROAD|BANGALORE-560 OO].... RESPONDENT(BY SMT.S.R.ANURADHA, ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS UNDER SEC.260-A OF|INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED|31/10/2007 PASSED IN ITA NO.233/BANG/2006 FOR THE|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-2002, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE|COURT TO:
1. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF.LAW STATE THRREBIN
2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SEI ASIDE THE ORDERDATED 31/10/2007 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX)APPEBLLATETRIBUNAL,BANGALORE,IN-ITA|NO.233/BANG/2006 CONFIRMING THE ORDERS OF THE|APPELLATECOMMISSIONERANDDEPUTYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE —- 2(1),BANGALORE.|
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,N.AUMAR, J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JU DBGMENT
TheTEVEeETLhas preterred|this|appealchallenging the order passed by the Tribunal whichhas set aside the order imposing penalty on theground that the original assessment order itself 1svoid as it was passed beyond time.
2. The original assessment order was the subject|matter of appeal in ITA.NO.205/2008 before thisCourt where, this Court by its order dated 3.6.2014,has set aside the orders passed by the Tribunalholding it as barred by time and has held that theorder passed by the Assessing Authority is valid and itis within the time. In view of the said subsequent.events, the orders passed by the Iribunal as well asthe First Appellate Authority are unsustainable.Therefore, the impugned orders passed by theTribunal and the First Appellate Authority are lableto be set aside and the matter requires to be remittedto the First Appellate Authority to find out whether acase for imposing penalty is made out or not.
Accordingly, we pass the following:
4
ORD BER
The appeal is allowed. The impugned orders|passed by the First Appellate Authority as well as the
Tribunal are hereby set aside and the matter isremitted back to the First Appellate Authority toconsider the question of imposing penalty afresh afterhearing both the parties.
sD/-JUDGE|sD/-JUDGE|
sD/-
RS/*|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.