Ita/388/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-14 v. M/S Ram Pal & Party (Aop) Through
High Court
11 Dec 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/388/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-14 v. M/S Ram Pal & Party (Aop) Through
Date of order
11 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/388/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-14 v. M/S Ram Pal & Party (Aop) Through, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~77
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 388/2016PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-14
..... Appellant
Through:Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr.SiddharthManocha, Advocate
versus
M/S RAM PAL & PARTY (AOP)Through:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLIO R D E R%11.12.2019
..... Respondent
In the light of the circular dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes (JudicialSection), Government of India, which fixes the monetary limit in respect oftax effect, inter alia, before the High Court in which the Department couldpursue the matter as Rs. 1,00,00,000/- and in view of the fact that the taxeffect in the present case is Rs. 69,60,255/-, the present appeal is disposed ofas not pressed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
DECEMBER 11, 2019v
REKHA PALLI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue