Ita/390/2014 Of B.k.jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ludhiana
High Court
19 Oct 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/390/2014 Of B.k.jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ludhiana
Date of order
19 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/390/2014 Of B.k.jain v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ludhiana, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.390 of 2014Date of decision: 19.10.2015
B.K.Jain
.....- Appe
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana (Punjab)
....nesponden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICEK RAMENDRA JAIN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported 1n the Digest?
Present: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the revenue.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J,
For orders, see ITA No.386 of 2014(B.K. Jain —
Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Ludhiana).
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)
Judge
October 19, 2015
GURBAX SINGH! q 2015.11.17 12:35I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
(Ramendra Jain)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue