Ita/391/2011 Of Allergan India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/391/2011 Of Allergan India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/391/2011 Of Allergan India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in|case, occasion SO arises. an/- Sda/-|JUDGESda/-|JUDGE.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 15 DAY OF FEBRUARY 20271.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
1LT.A. NO.391 OF 2011C/WLT.ANQ.1L/7L QF 2ZOQ
IN I.T.A.NO.391 OF ZO11
BETWEEN:
ALLERGAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDLEVEL -2, PRESTIGE OBELISKNO.3, KASTURBA ROAD
BANGALORE —- 560 OO1
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR —- FINANCE,MR.MOHAN RAJAGOPALAN
— APPELLANT|
(BY MS.MANASA ANANTHAN, ADV. FORSRI.T.SURYANARAYANA., ADV.)
AND:
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT,|
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD,
BANASHANKARI III STAGE,BANGALORE -—- 560 O85BANGALORE -—- 560 O85
2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT,INCOME-TAX, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT,
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD,
BANASHANKARI III STAGEBANGALORE - 560 O85.
3.0THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -11 (1),5 FLOOR, R.P.BHAVAN,|NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BANGALORE - 560 OO1.INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -11 (1),5 FLOOR, R.P.BHAVAN,|NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BANGALORE - 560 OO1.
.., RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX)ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30/06/2011 PASSED|IN|LIANOS.901,.9027AND|903(BANG)2010,FORTHE|ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-04, 2004-05 & 2005-06, PRAYING TO:-|I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED|THEREIN, Il. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS|PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NOS.901, 902 &|903(BANG) 2010 DATED 30/06/2011, IN THE INTEREST OFJUSTICE AND EQUITY.
IN LT.A.NO.1L/L OF 2ZO1
BE!]VWEE
ALLERGAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDLEVEL -2, PRESTIGE OBELISK|NO.3, KASTURBA ROADBANGALORE —- 560 OO1REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR — FINANCE,MR.MOHAN RAJAGOPALAN
— APPELLANT|
(BY MS.MANASA ANANTHAN, ADV. FORSRI.T.SURYANARAYANA, ADV.) |
AND:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT,
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD,
BANASHANKARI III STAGE,
BANGALORE - 560 O85.
2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT,
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD,
BANASHANKARI III STAGE
BANGALORE -—- 560 O85
3.0THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -11 (1), BANGALORE
JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD,BANASHANKARI III STAGEBANGALORE -—- 560 O85BANASHANKARI III STAGEBANGALORE -—- 560 O85
.., RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX)ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16/03/2012 PASSED|IN ITA NO.1490/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-O7 PRAYING TO:- I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS|OF LAW STATED THEREIN, IJ. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDETHE|ORDER|OFTHE.LIA]DATED16/03/2012IN|LIANO.1490/BANG/2010 TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED THEREIN, IN|THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE I.T.AS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, |
ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ms. Manasa Ananthan, learned counsel appearing for|
Sri.T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee.
Sri.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed qa memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeals.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeals are
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in|case, occasion SO arises.
an/-
Sda/-|JUDGESda/-|JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.