Case Law › High Court › Ita/39/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (I...

Ita/39/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation-1) v. Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co Ltd

High Court 14 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

14 Jan 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/39/2011 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation-1) v. Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-r o/o 14.OL.2O11 Mr. Abhishek [Maratha, ][Sr' ][Standing ][Counsel ][with]Ms. Rnshul [Sharma, Advocate ][for ][the ][appellant']Mr. S. Ganesh, [Sr' ][Advocate ][with ][Mr' ][Anish ][Kapur']Advocate for [the ][resPondent.] Present: +lTA Nos. 3L, [32' ][35-40/201L]* * We find todaY [that ][onlY]issue which is [raised ][bY ][the]in [these ][cases ][pertains]to charging of [interest ][under]Department view of the assessee's [income]Section 234t- [of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][in]being subjected [to ][TDS.] As far as this [question ][is ][concerned, ][it ][already ][stands] ' decided by the [judgment of ][this ][Court ][dated ][30th ][August, 2010 ][in ][a]batch matter, [the ][lead ][case ][being ][Director, ][Income ][Tax ][v' ] Mitsubishi in [No. ][491 ][of ][2008, ][in ][favour ][of ][the ][assessee'] the [present ][appeal is ][hereby ][dismissed.]Accordingly, --)@ --)M.L. MEHTA, J. JANUARY [L4,20LL] flIC

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.