Ita/395/2012 Of Bosch Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR I.T.A. NO.395 OF 2012 BETWEEN: BOSCH LIMITED P.O. BOX NO.3000, HOSUR ROAD, ADUGODI, BANGALORE-560 030, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CFO MR. SOUMITRA BHATTACHARYA. (BY MISS MAHIMA GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) SRI T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) ... APPELLANT AND: 1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085. 2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT JSS TOWERS, 100 FEET ROAD, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085. (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) - - - ... RESPONDENTS THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18.07.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.102(BANG)/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 18.07.2012 IN ITA NO.102(BANG)/2011 (ANNEXURE-J) TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED THEREIN, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DAY, JUDGMENT Miss Mahima Goud, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr. E.I. Sanmathi, learned counsel for the Revenue. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the dispute in this appeal has been amicably settled under the provisions of the “Vivad Se Vishwas’ scheme. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE HR Sd/- JUDGE