Ita/398/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt Ltd
High Court
20 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/398/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt Ltd
Date of order
20 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008, 2007-08
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/398/2018 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUON THE 20 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 201383
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN |INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.398 OF 2701
BETWEEN:
1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, CENTRAL,
QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU,BENGALURU,
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10(1),
NEW DELHI. ... APPELLANTS ©
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND=
M/S DELHI INTERNATIONALAIRPORT PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAAN BHAVAN, TERMINAL
1B, INDIRA GANDHI,
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, —NEW DELHI, |
PAN: AACCD35/0F. ~.. RESPONDENT.
THIS INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION J60-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ARISING.OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.127.7201/7 PASSED IN INO.4202/DEL/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-2008, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO; DECIDE THEFOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHERQUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE!HON BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT; SET ASIDE THEAPPELLATE ORDER DATED 14.1272.201/7 PASSED BY TINCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, B BENCH, NEW)DELHALIN|APPEAL|PROCEEDINGS|NO,LIANO.4202/DEL/2013 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08, AS”SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH!OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF!JUSTICE. |
OK OOK
THIS INCOME TAXK APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERSTHIS DAY,RAVI.MALIMATHJ,DELIVEREDTHE|FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The office objection is upheld.
2.|Tne appeal is not maintainable before the High
Court Of Karnataka, Bengaluru. Hence, the appeal standsdisposed off for statistical purpose. |
cmHowever, liberty is granted to the appellants to.
file a necessary appeal in accordance with law before the.jurisdictional Hign Court.
SD/- SD/-JUDGE |JUDGE ©.
JUDGE ©.
JJ.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.