Ita/399/2010 Of Kerala Minerals And Metals Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/399/2010 Of Kerala Minerals And Metals Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/399/2010 Of Kerala Minerals And Metals Limited v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1932
ITA.No. 399 of 2010()
---------------------
ITA.708/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
--------------------
KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LIMITED,
SANKARAMANGALAM, CHAVARA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.A.KUMAR
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
---------------
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE-I, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal No.399 of 2010
....................................................................Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2010.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since the issue raised is covered in assessee's own case videjudgment in I.T.A. No.88/2008 and connected cases, we allow theappeal filed by the assessee by vacating the order of the Tribunal andby directing the Assessing Officer to follow the above judgment andgrant relief to the assessee in terms of the judgment.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
BHABANI PRASAD RAY
Judge
pms
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.