Case LawHigh Court › Ita/40/1999 Of Katherine Bortwick v. The...

Ita/40/1999 Of Katherine Bortwick v. The Comm. Of Income-Tax

High Court 12 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/40/1999 Of Katherine Bortwick v. The Comm. Of Income-Tax
Date of order
12 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/40/1999 Of Katherine Bortwick v. The Comm. Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The above application was admitted on 12th April, 1999 on the following question of law : Whether the Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal and confirming the action of the C.I.T. in revising the order passed by the Assessing Officer in which the Assessing Officer had allowed benefit of S.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.40 OF 1999 Katherine Borthwick .. Petitioner. V/s. The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City XIII .. Respondent. Ms.Asifa Khan with Mr.V.B. Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The above application was admitted on 12th April, 1999 on the following question of law : Whether the Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal and confirming the action of the C.I.T. in revising the order passed by the Assessing Officer in which the Assessing Officer had allowed benefit of S. 54 in respect of the two adjoining flats used as a single house ? 3. The above application pertains to AY 1991-92. Both the learned counsel agreed that the above question requires consideration. In view thereof, statement of case is called for. The Tribunal is directed to send statement of case as expeditiously as possible. 4. The application stands disposed of. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan