Ita/40/2015 Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xiii v. M/S. Sheo Sakti Coke Industries
High Court
19 Jan 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/40/2015 Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xiii v. M/S. Sheo Sakti Coke Industries
Date of order
19 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/40/2015 Commissioner Of Income Tax - Xiii v. M/S. Sheo Sakti Coke Industries, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on theground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD – 13
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/40/2015COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - XIIIVS.M/S. SHEO SAKTI COKE INDUSTRIES
BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
A N D
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADATED : JANUARY 19 2022. [Via Video Conference]
Appearance :
Mr. Manabendra Nath Bandyopadhyay, Advocate …for appellant
The Court :- This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260Aof the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant/revenuehas given instruction to the effect that this appeal cannot be prosecutedby the appellant/revenue on the ground of low tax effect.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on theground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have beenraised, are left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
GH/kb.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.