Ita/407/2016 Of Shri C Raju Gouda v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/407/2016 Of Shri C Raju Gouda v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/407/2016 Of Shri C Raju Gouda v. Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A
BETWEEN:
1T.A. NO.407 OF 2016
SHRI. C. RAJU GOUDADEEPAM CONSTRUCTIONSNO.18/A, KANTOOR ROAD.ALANAHALLI EXTENSION,MYSORE,
(BY MRS. VANAJA M.R., ADV.,)
.... APPELLAN/
AND*
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-1(1), MYSORE.
(BY MR. T.N.C. SRIDHAR, ADV.,)
.., RESPONDENT
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX|ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 04.09.2015 PASSEDIN ITA NO.795/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08,PRAYING TO: |
(i) FORMULATE THE QUESTIONS OF LAW AS FORMULATED|ABOVE.
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER.PASSED IN ITA NO.795/BANG/2013 DATED 4-9-2015 BY HOLDINGTHE APPELLANT HAS DISCHARGED HIS BURDEN IN ACCORDANCE|WITH SEC. 68 OF THE IT ACT.
(iii) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER ARE DIRECTION ARE.NECESSARY ON THE FACT AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.|
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Smt.Vanaja M.R., learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.T.N.C.Sridhar, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.