Case LawHigh Court › Ita/408/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/408/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.abdul Rahim

High Court 04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/408/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.abdul Rahim
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/408/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.abdul Rahim, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 12TH ASWINA, 1940 ITA.No. 408 of 2010 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OTS&A 47/2008 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 13-01-2010 APPELLANT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/S: SRI.S.ABDUL RAHIMDARUSALAM, KRISHNAPURAM, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The learned Standing Counsel, Government of India(Taxes) submits, on instructions, that the Revenue may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal on the basis of thelitigation policy framed by the Central Board of DirectTaxes. Hence, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn,leaving open the questions of law. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S.158B(C) DATED 26.8.2005. ANNEXURE BCIT(A)'S ORDER IN APPEAL NO.ITA K 073/05-06 DATED 12.12.2007. ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 13.1.2010.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan