Case Law › High Court › Ita/41/2001 Of The Director Of Income Ta...

Ita/41/2001 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. The Trustees Of Seth Hansraj P. Thackersey Education Fund

High Court 05 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Dec 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/41/2001 Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) v. The Trustees Of Seth Hansraj P. Thackersey Education Fund, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Application No.41 of 2001 The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) .. .. Applicant v/s. Seth Hansraj Pragji Thackersey Education Fund. .. .. Respondent Mr.A.S. Rao for applicant. Mr.B.D.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for rerspondent. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 5th December 2005 P.C. : . Heard Mr.Rao in support of this Application. Mr.Damodar appearing for the respondent points out that a reference has already been made for opinion of this Court for the same assessment year raising the same issue in I.T.A.No.3274 (Bom)/1993. The said reference is numbered as Reference No.143 of 1997. The applicant is, therefore, not required to press this Application. The Application is rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.