Ita/41/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepa Nair
High Court
11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/41/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepa Nair
Date of order
11 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/41/2018 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Deepa Nair, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1941
ITA.No.41 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05-10-2017 IN ITA 365/COCH/2015 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHIRUVANATHAPURAM
BY ADV. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:
DEEPA NAIR,DAUGHTER AND LEGAL HEIR OF LATE. SRI C.P VASUDEVAN NAIR FLAT NO. 9, SIVAPARVATHI APARTMENTS,NEAR VIJAYA SREE EYE HOSPITAL, DILKUSH ROAD KOTTAPURAM, POOTHLE, THRISSUR – 680004.
*SMT. DEEPA VASUDEVAN NAIR,1/821, SREE PARAMESWARAM, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O.,KUMARAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 011.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
R1 BY ADV. SMT.NISHA JOHN
R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN
R1 BY ADV. SHRI.A.K.ANANDA VISHNU
* ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT IS MODIFIED AS PER ORDER DATED 09-10-2018 IN IA No.3/18 IN ITA No.41/18.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON11.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J. &ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
-------------------------------------------------
I.T. Appeal No. 41 OF 2018-------------------------------------------------
DATED THIS THE 11[th] DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
J U D G M E N T
Abdul Rehim, J.:
Standing counsel for Government of India (Taxes) had filedmemo praying for withdrawal of the appeal, based on the latestlitigation policy of the Income Tax Department.
2.Accordingly, permission is granted to the appellant forwithdrawal of the appeal. The appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
3.The Registry shall make refund of the court fee to theextent admissible under the relevant statutory provisions.
Sd/-
C.K.ABDUL REHIM
JUDGE
AMG
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMANJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICERU/S.143(3) R.W.SEC.153A DATED 31/12/2009U/S.143(3) R.W.SEC.153A DATED 31/12/2009
ANNEXURE-BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER U/S.16A(3) OF THE WEALTH TAXACT, 1957 READ WITH SECTION 50C(2) OF THE INCOME TAXACT, 1961 DATED 14/3/2014 OF THE DISTRICT VALUATIONOFFICER, VALUATION CELL INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,CHENNAI.ACT, 1957 READ WITH SECTION 50C(2) OF THE INCOME TAXACT, 1961 DATED 14/3/2014 OF THE DISTRICT VALUATIONOFFICER, VALUATION CELL INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,CHENNAI.
ANNEXURE-CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(APPEALS) DATED 30/3/2015TAX(APPEALS) DATED 30/3/2015
ANNEXURE-DTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH IN ITA NO. 365/COCH/2015DATED 5/10/2017TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH IN ITA NO. 365/COCH/2015DATED 5/10/2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.