Ita/41/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Sh. Vipul Goel
High Court
22 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/41/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Sh. Vipul Goel
Date of order
22 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/41/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Sh. Vipul Goel, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA-41-2019(0&M)
a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHAN DIGAR
119
ITA-41-2019 (O&M)Date of decision °:22.10.201
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Faridabad....Appellant
VeTSUS
Sh. Vipul Goel
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present :Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for|Mr. T.K.Joshi, Sr. Standing counselfor the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
---
1,CM;990FCllm2019
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowedand delay of 48 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
2.Main Case
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hasinstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the
appeal, in case something survives therein.
ITA-41-2019(0&M)
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pendingC.M, if any also stands disposed of.C.M, if any also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE22.10.2019anuradhaWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether Reportable |Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.