Ita/414/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.kochaniyan Unnithan
High Court
19 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/414/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.kochaniyan Unnithan
Date of order
19 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/414/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.kochaniyan Unnithan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
WEDNESDAY,THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 28TH BHADRA, 1940
ITA.No. 414 of 2010
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 843/2008 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 23-04-2010 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07
APPELLANT:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R. MENON, SR.COUNSEL GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT:
SHRI.KOCHANIYAN UNNITHANNARAYANA BHAVAN, T.C 9/2196, KURUPS LANE, SASTHEMANGALAM P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 010.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned Standing Counsel, Government ofIndia (Taxes) submits that he has instruction from theRevenue to withdraw the appeal on the basis of thelitigation policy. In such circumstance, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn, but, however,leaving thequestions of law open.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE
Sd/-
ASHOK MENON
jma
JUDGE
I.T.A. NO.414/2010
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER U/S 153A/153 C RWS 143(3) OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 21.12.2007
ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) DATED 11.4.2008ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATETRIBUNAL DATED 23.4.2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.