Case LawHigh Court › Ita/418/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/418/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Epson India Pvt Ltd

High Court 18 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/418/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Epson India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
18 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/418/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Epson India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: OK AK THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|COMING.ON.FOR|ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is filed Dy the appellants’ Counsel seeking to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. | In terms of the said memo, the appea...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 18 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 | BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING ©80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA.& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING ©80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA. BENGALURU-560 095.. 2.|THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-T AXCIRCLE-2(1)(2) |2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING ©80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA _BENGALURU-560 095..CIRCLE-2(1)(2) |2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING ©80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA _BENGALURU-560 095.. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI: JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI! K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)SRI! K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND M/S. EPSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED17 FLOOR, THE MILLENIA TOWER ANO.1, MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR —BENGALURU-560 OO8.| RESPONDENT| (BY SMT: TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER|DATED 06.03.2018 PASSED IN MP NO.19/BANG/2018 (IN|IT(TP)A NO.293/BANG/2017), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR|2012-2013, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO FORMULATE|THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY.THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN|M.P.NO.19/BANG/2018CINIT(TP)A.NO.293/BANG/2017),.DATED 06.03.2018 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE DRP.AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT|COMMISSIONEROF|INCOMETAX,CIRCLE-2(1)(2),BENGALURU. OK AK THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|COMING.ON.FOR|ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT A memo is filed Dy the appellants’ Counsel seeking to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to challenge theimpugned order by filing the writ petition. | In terms of the said memo, the appeal is dismissed.as withdrawn. Tne liberty as sought for is granted. | Sd/- JUDGE *pgn/- Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan