Case LawHigh Court › Ita/4/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income...

Ita/4/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.thajudeen

High Court 04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/4/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.thajudeen
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/4/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.s.thajudeen, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 12TH ASWINA, 1940 ITA.No. 4 of 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 13/2008 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 13-01-2010 APPELLANT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/S: SRI.S.THAJUDEEN,AKBAR MAHAL,KRISHNAPURAM, KAYAMKULAM - 690 502. BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The learned Standing Counsel, Government of India(Taxes) submits, on instructions, that the Revenue may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal on the basis of thelitigation policy framed by the Central Board of DirectTaxes. Hence, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn,leaving open the questions of law. Sd/-K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 158BC,DATED 26.8.2005 ANNEXURE B CIT(A)'S ORDER IN APPEAL NO ITA K 078/05-06 DATED 14.1.2008 ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 13.1.2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan