Ita/420/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Karnataka State Tourism
High Court
31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/420/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Karnataka State Tourism
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/420/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Karnataka State Tourism, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4270 OF 270
BETWEEN:
Ll.PR, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4BMTC COMPLEXBMTC COMPLEX
KORMANGALA, BENGALURU.
2DDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX)CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BENGALURU.CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BENGALURU.
_. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI: E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND=
KARNATAKA STATE TOURISM.DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED NO.49, 2 FLOOR, WEST AVENUE|KHANIJA BHAVAN|RACE COURSE ROAD|BENGALURU-560 OOL.
. RESPONDENT
(BY MISS: MANASA ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)SRI: T. SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATED25.01.2017.PASSED|IN|LIANO.10/70/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20112012, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE|FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER)QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE|HON BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE|APPELLATE ORDER DATED 25.01.201/7 PASSED BY THEINCOME|TAXAPPELLAIETRIBUNAL,‘CcBENCH,BENGALURU AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE'S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA|NO.10/70/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20112012 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT,|IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
OK OOK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit tnatthe appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetarylimits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019
C
passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New|
Delnl.
2).In view of the submission made, the appeal is
Gismissed as sucn.
Sd/-JUDGE
*pgn/-|
Sd/-.JUDGE |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.