Ita/422/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. M/S Amazone Development
High Court
24 Nov 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/422/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. M/S Amazone Development
Date of order
24 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/422/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income -Tax v. M/S Amazone Development, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATED THIS THR 24 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 20105)
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA|
ITA NO.422/2015
BETWEEN:
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE.
oD THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,|
CIRCLE-11(1),.
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE —- 560 OO1.
~.. APPELLANTS|
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND , ADV.)
AND:
M/S.AMAZONE DEVELOPMENTCENTRE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,, ,9 Ce LO FLOOR,BRIGADE GATEWAY, WORLD TRADE CENTRE,|NO.26/1, DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD,MALLESWARAM(W),BANGALORE-560 O55.)
.. RESPONDEN
(BY SRI P.DINESH, ADV..,)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF IT ACT,|1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 16.04.2015 PASSED IN|ITA NO.13602/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009
2010|PRAYINGTO|I)|RFORMULATETHESUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE.THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITANO.1362/BANG/2014 DATED 16.4.2015 CONFIRMING THE.ORDER OF THR APPELLATE COMMISSIONBR AND CONFIRM|THERE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPULY COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE.
‘THIS|ITA|COMING ONFOR ADMISSIONVINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THIS DAY, |
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for theappellants as well as Sri P.Dinesh, learned counsel forthe respondent and perused the record.
2 |The questions involved in this appeal arecovered by the decision of this Court in the case of
Commissioner of Income Tax -vs- Tata Elxi Limited
(2012) 349 ITR 98.
In the light of the aforesaid judgment, this appealstands dismissed.
3.|However, it is Submitted by learned counselfor the appellants that against the judgment of this
Court, an appeal is filed to the Apex Court and ispending consideration.
4In the event of the Apex Court reversing thejudgment of this Court, the Assessing Authority shallpass consequential orders in terms of Section 260(1A) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, in conformity with theoutcome of the appeal before the Supreme Court.
TL|
sd/-
JUDGE|
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.