Ita/43/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. S.m.v. (Firm)
High Court
12 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/43/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. S.m.v. (Firm)
Date of order
12 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/43/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. S.m.v. (Firm), the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
MONDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1940
ITA.No. 43 of 2008
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 1017/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 14-12-2005
APPELLANT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH , SC FOR IT
RESPONDENT/S:
M/S. S.M.V. (FIRM)MAIN ROAD, KOLLAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel,Government of India (taxes) that the impugned order in theappeal has been recalled by the Tribunal in a miscellaneousapplication filed before it. In such circumstances, the appealis rejected as infructuous.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGESd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 27.1.2004.
ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) DATED 4.3.2005.
ANNEXURE CCERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 14.12.2005.
ANNEXURE DTRUE COPY OF THE CBDT'S INSTRUCTION NO.2/2005 DATED 24.10.2005.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.