In Ita/43/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Suresh Mittal, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In these circumstances, the Revenue cannot press theseappeals and it is so stated by learned counsel for the Revenue.In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed as not pressedThe next date of 25.07.2019 in these appeals is herebycancelled. s. ravindra bhat, j march 29, 2019 PRATEJK JALAN, J aj
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Signed By:RAM DATTSigning Date:15.10.2024 16:15Certify that the digital and physical file havebeen compared and the digital data is as perthe physical file and no page is missing.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
ORDER29.03.2019
n
At the outset, it is pomted out that the tax effect in these appealsis below the limit prescribed by the prevailing notifications (dated11.07.2018). In these circumstances, the Revenue cannot press theseappeals and it is so stated by learned counsel for the Revenue.In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed as not pressedThe next date of 25.07.2019 in these appeals is herebycancelled.
s. ravindra bhat, j
march 29, 2019
PRATEJK JALAN, J
aj
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue