Ita/43/2021 Nagreeka Exports Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 6, Kolkata
High Court
27 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/43/2021 Nagreeka Exports Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 6, Kolkata
Date of order
27 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/43/2021 Nagreeka Exports Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 6, Kolkata, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: II) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of the Tribunal was erroneous in not properly appreciating the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in RE : Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills.
Decision: The appeal has no merit and is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD – 2
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/43/2021 NAGREEKA EXPORTS LTD. VS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 6, KOLKATA
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 27[th] February, 2024
Appearance :Mr. Ranjit Kumar Murarka, Adv. Mr. S.D. Verma, Adv. Mr.Ananda Sen, Adv. Mr. Vivek Murarka, Adv. ...for the appellant. Mr. Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. ...for the respondent.
1.This appeal was admitted by this Court by an order dated 24[th]November, 2021. This appeal relates to assessment year 2008-09 which was admitted by this Court by an order dated 24[th]November, 2021 on the following substantial questions of law : “I) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of the Tribunal is erroneous casa being perverse in reversing the order of the C.I.T(A) on the basis of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court where the question for consideration was not allowability under Section 37(1) of the Act as was in the present case? II) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of the Tribunal was erroneous in not properly appreciating the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in RE : Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills. (294) ITR 328) a later decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and
specifically referred to in the petitioner’s submission before the Tribunal?”
2.Identical question being inter parties have been decided today
by this Court in ITA 373 of 2009 and both the questions have been answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
3.Respectfully following our judgment in ITA 373 of 2009 passed
today, both the afore-quoted substantial questions of law are answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue. The appeal has no merit and is, therefore, dismissed.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
S.Das/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.