Ita/432/2018 Of M. Raghuram P Nambyar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)
High Court
27 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/432/2018 Of M. Raghuram P Nambyar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax (International Taxation)
Date of order
27 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/432/2018 Of M. Raghuram P Nambyar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax (International Taxation), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ITA NO.432 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
M. RAGHURAM P NAMBYAR, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HAVING PAN , RESIDING AT E-901, MANTRI ESPANA, DEVARABISANAHALLI, BELLANDUR POST,
BANGALORE - 560103. ... APPELLANT
(BY MISS MAHIM GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE -1(2), BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560095.
2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560095. ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 02.03.2018, PASSED IN ITA NO. 2007/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010, PRAYING TO:
(A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;
(B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH 'C', PRONOUNCED ON 02.03.2018 IN ITA NO. 2007/BANG/2016 (ANNEXURE-'C'); AND
(C) PASS SUCH OTHER OR FURTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Miss. Mahim Goud, learned counsel for
Mr.
T. Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
The said memo is placed on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HR
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.