Ita/432/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 7 v. Oriental Bank Of Commerce Through: None

$~108 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 432/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary and Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advs. versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % O R D E R11.04.2018 The question of law urged by the Revenue in its appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is whether the ITAT erred in restricting the disallowance (to 1% of the gross exempt income) under Section 14A of the Act. It is urged that for a subsequent year the assessee had accepted the disallowance to the extent of 5%. This Court notices that the exempt income was earned by the assessee when Rule 8D was not in existence. The ITAT has relied upon the decision of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. HDFC Bank Ltd, (2014) –366 ITR 505 (Bom.) where a similar cap on the disallowance to the extent of 1% was applied. Since the ITAT followed the authority which contained same reasoning, this Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises. In the circumstances of the case, the appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J APRIL 11, 2018 rc A. K. CHAWLA, J