Case Law › High Court › Ita/435/2010 Of M/S Kingfisher Training...

Ita/435/2010 Of M/S Kingfisher Training & Aviation Services Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Jan 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

08 Jan 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/435/2010 Of M/S Kingfisher Training & Aviation Services Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF JANUARY 2020 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANL LT.A. NO.435 OF 2010C/WLT.A. NOQ.7Q OF ZQ1L LT.A. NQ.435 OF 2010 BETWEEN: M/S. KINGFISHER TRAINING &AVIATION SERVICES LTD|(FORMERLY KNOWN AS KINGFISHERAIRLINES LTD)REP. BY [ITS DIRECTORSRI. T.R. VENKATADRI.AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.S/O SRI. LATE RAMAVADHYAR|THE UB GROUP, UB TOWERLEVEL 12, UB CITYVITTAL MALLYA ROADBANGALORE-560001. .., APPELLAN | (By Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.)| AND"THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF |INCOME-TAXCIRCLE 11(5)14/3, 5 FLOOR, R.P. BUILDING NRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) THIS I.7.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.I.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30-7-2010|PASSED IN ITA No.1206/BANG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. ALLOW THE APPEAL|AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT IN ITA!No.1206/BANG/2009, DATED 30-7-2010 (ANNEXURE-A) &ETC.. 1LT.A. NO.70 OF 2013 BEI|WEEN M/S. KINGFISHER TRAINING &AVIATION SERVICES LTD|(FORMERLY KNOWN AS KINGFISHERAIRLINES LTD)REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR.SRI. T.R. VENKATADRI.AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.S/O SRI. LATE RAMAVADHYAR|THE UB GROUP, UB TOWER)LEVEL 12, UB CITYVITTAL MALLYA ROADBANGALORE-560001. .., APPELLAN | (By Sri. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADV.)| AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF |INCOME-TAXCIRCLE 11(5) 14/3, 5 FLOOR, R.P. BUILDINGNRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12-10-2012|PASSED IN ITA Nos.82 & 83/BANG/2012, FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 & 2008-09, PRAYING TO)FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED.THEREIN. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER|OF THE ITAT BEARING ITA Nos.82 & 83/BANG/2012 DATED|12-10-2012 (ANNEXURE-A), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE)AND EQUITY. THESE I.1T.AS. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Mr.S.Partnasaratni,iearnec|counsel]for.the appellant.| Mr.K.V.Aravind,learned|counsel|for.therespondent. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo, seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the vakalath. | The aforesaid memo is taken on record. �99-&8'7@5% �346�2<<625/�2&6�8'/>'//68�;-&�A273�-;� <&-/69:3'-7�� %!&�� %!&��

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.