Case LawHigh Court › Ita/437/2010 Of Dr (Mrs) Anwar Basith v....

Ita/437/2010 Of Dr (Mrs) Anwar Basith v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 19 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/437/2010 Of Dr (Mrs) Anwar Basith v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
19 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/437/2010 Of Dr (Mrs) Anwar Basith v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: These appeals are disposed of in terms of the Memo.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed byMALA K NLocation: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JUNE, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 437 OF 2010 C/W INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2010 IN ITA NO.437 OF 2010BETWEEN: DR.(MRS.). ANWAR BASITH, NO.16, DR.OMAR SHARIEFF ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHANKAR.A., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXUE, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. …RESPONDENT - 2 - ITA No. 437 of 2010C/W ITA No. 123 of 2010 (BY SRI. DILIP.M., STANDING COUNSEL FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 09-08-2010 PASSED IN ITA NO.101 TO 106/BANG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ETC., IN ITA NO.123 OF 2010 BETWEEN: DR.(MRS.). ANWAR BASITH, NO.16, DR.OMAR SHARIEFF ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. (BY SRI. SHANKAR.A., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANT AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXUE, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DILIP.M., STANDING COUNSEL FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 27-11-2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.145 TO 149/BNG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 1995-96 TO 1997-98 AND 1999-2000 TO 2000-01, TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ETC., - 3 - THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Shri A.Shankar, learned Senior Advocate for appellant has filed a Memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw these Appeals. 2. Memo filed in ITA No.437/2010 reads as follows: 1."The above named Appellant has filed Income Tax Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 2001-02 to 2006-07. 2.The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Years 2001-02 to 2006-07. 3.Thereafter, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru - 3 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. Copies of the Form-3 is enclosed herewith for this Hon’ble Court’s reference and records. - 4 - 4.Wherefore, in view of the above submissions the Appellant humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Income Tax Appeals with liberty to revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Memo filed in ITA No.123/2010 reads as follows: "1. The above named Appellant has filed Income Tax Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1999-00 and 2000-01. 2. The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1999-00 and 2000-01. 3. Thereafter, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru - 3 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. 3. Memo filed in ITA No.123/2010 reads as follows: "1. The above named Appellant has filed Income Tax Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1999-00 and 2000-01. 2. The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1999-00 and 2000-01. 3. Thereafter, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru - 3 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. Copies of the Form-3 is enclosed herewith for this Hon’ble Court’s reference and records. 4. Wherefore, in view of the above submissions the Appellant humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Income Tax Appeals with liberty to revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest of justice and equity." 4. Memo be kept in record. Leave granted. These appeals are disposed of in terms of the Memo. No costs. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan