Case LawHigh Court › Ita/44/2018 Of The Greater Cochin Develo...

Ita/44/2018 Of The Greater Cochin Development Authority v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 31 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/44/2018 Of The Greater Cochin Development Authority v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
2011-12, 2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/44/2018 Of The Greater Cochin Development Authority v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 9TH BHADRA, 1943 ITA NO. 44 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 177/Coch/2017 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH, COCHIN APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYS.A.ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM - 682 020, REPRESENTEDBY ITS SECRETARY, MRS.USHAKUMARI P.R.ERNAKULAMBY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRSREEJITH R.NAIR RESPONDENT/APPELLANT: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), KOCHI - 682 018.ERNAKULAMBY ADVS.SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTKMV.PANDALAI THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.08.2021, ALONG WITH ITA.46/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM TUESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 9TH BHADRA, 1943 ITA NO. 46 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 178/COCH/2017 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,S.A ROADKADAVANTHRAERNAKULAM-682020REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARYMRS.USHAKUMARI P.RBY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIRSREEJITH R.NAIRMEKHALA M.BENNYACHYUT K PADMARAJ RESPONDENT/APPELLANT: THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)(EXEMPTION)KOCHI682018 OTHER PRESENT: SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.08.2021, ALONG WITH ITA.44/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT [ITA Nos.44/2018, 46/2018] S.V.Bhatti, J. Heard Sri.Anil D.Nair and learned Standing counselSri.Christopher Abraham for parties. Learned counsel Mr.Anil D.Nair informs the Courtthat the assessee has availed the benefit of 'vivad seviswas' and the assessee does not want to press theappeals. Statement is placed on record. Appeals aredismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/-S.V.BHATTIJUDGE css/ Sd/-VIJU ABRAHAMJUDGE PETITIONER ANNEXURE ANNEXURE-A ANNEXURE-B ANNEXURE-C ANNEXURE-D APPENDIX OF ITA 44/2018 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 18/3/2015 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (APPEALS), FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPEAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE A.Y.2011-12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 1/3/2018 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT PETITIONER ANNEXURE ANNEXURE A ANNEXURE B ANNEXURE C ANNEXURE D APPENDIX OF ITA 46/2018 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD. 17.3.2015 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (APPEALS) FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DT.28.2.2017 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPEAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE A.Y. 2012-13 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 1.3.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT Ita Nos.44 & 46 OF 2018 6
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan