Case LawHigh Court › Ita/451/2018 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Ita/451/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 v. M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Ltd

High Court 13 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/451/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 v. M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Ltd
Date of order
13 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/451/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 2 v. M/S. Bokaro Power Supply Co. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance; the ITAT confirmed that order by relying upon the judgment of this court in NTPC Power Company Ltd.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 451/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2, ..... Appellant Through Mr.Vibhooti Malhotra, Jr.Standing Counsel and Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, Advocates. versus M/S. BOKARO POWER SUPPLY CO. LTD. Through Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 13.04.2018 The question of law urged in this appeal is as to the taxability of the amount earned by the assessee towards interest on deployment of margin money and mobilization advance. The assessee had advanced amounts to its service providers/contractors. The advanced money interest accrued, became the subject matter of controversy. The Assessing Officer (AO) added this interest earned as income from other sources, overruling the assessee’s contention that the amount needed to be capitalized, as such funds were inextricably intertwined with the capital expenditure which it had to incur in setting up a new plant. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance; the ITAT confirmed that order by relying upon the judgment of this court in NTPC Power Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax(ITA 1238/2011 decided on 17.7.2012). The Court is of the opinion that as a consequence no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J APRIL 13, 2018 ndn A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan