Case LawHigh Court › Ita/45/2018 Of Vijaya Hospitality And Re...

Ita/45/2018 Of Vijaya Hospitality And Resorts Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ernakulam

High Court 24 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/45/2018 Of Vijaya Hospitality And Resorts Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ernakulam
Date of order
24 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/45/2018 Of Vijaya Hospitality And Resorts Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ernakulam, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY ,THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 / 2ND ASWINA, 1940 ITA.No. 45 of 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 96/2015 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 02-03-2018 APPELLANT/S: VIJAYA HOSPITALITY AND RESORTS LTD.37/991, 1ST FLOOR, EMMY SQUARE, SA ROAD, ELAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM - 682 020 (PAN ) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR , MR BABOO K.C. BY ADVS.SRI.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR M.SRI.JOHN MATHAI K.SRI.JOSON MANAVALANSRI.KURYAN THOMASSRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAMSRI.P. GOPINATH MENONSRI.RAJA KANNAN RESPONDENT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ERNAKULAMC R BUILDINGS, I S PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682018. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.09.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. ConnectedmatterhasbeenconsideredinI.T.A.Nos.38,42 & 43 of 2018. The very same issue isdealt with here also. The assessment year in this Appealis 2010-2011. In such circumstances, the Income TaxAppeal shall stand allowed, restoring the appeal beforethe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, for consideration onmerits, subject however to the condition of payment ofRs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) to theChief Minister's Distress Relief Fund, within a period ofone month from the date of receipt of certified copy ofthis judgment. We make it clear that the appellant wouldbe entitled to tax benefits, if any, with the payment ofthe aforeasid amount to the Chief Minister's DistressRelief Fund. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE APPENDIX dkr /TRUE COPY/PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan