Ita/458/2018 Of Gmr Projects Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/458/2018 Of Gmr Projects Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012, 2009-2010, 2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/458/2018 Of Gmr Projects Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF JULY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G. UMA
I.T.A No.458 OF 2018C/WI.T.A No.459 OF 2018I.T.A No.460 OF 2018I.T.A No.461 OF 2018
I.T.A No.458 OF 2018
BETWEEN :
GMR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH GMR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. GRANDHI KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
…APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH V.C]
AND:
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2)
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
. . . .
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED:21/02/2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.2215/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.02.2018 BEARING IN ITA NO.2215/BANGA/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
I.T.A No.459 OF 2018
BETWEEN :
GMR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH GMR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. GRANDHI KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS …APPELLANT(BY SHRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH V.C] AND: ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX RANGE - 11, 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
. . . .
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED:16/06/2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.185/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 16.06.2017 BEARING IN ITA NO.185/BANG/2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
I.T.A No.460 OF 2018
BETWEEN :
GMR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH GMR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORTATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. GRANDHI KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH V.C]
AND:
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
. . . .
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED:21/02/2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.2214/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.02.2018 BEARING IN ITA NO.2214/BANG/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
I.T.A No.461 OF 2018
BETWEEN :
GMR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH GMR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED), A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. GRANDHI KIRAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH V.C]
AND:
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
. . . .
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.02.2018 BEARING IN ITA NO.2214/BANG/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
I.T.A No.461 OF 2018
BETWEEN :
GMR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH GMR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED), A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 NO. 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. GRANDHI KIRAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. BALRAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH V.C]
AND:
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
. . . .
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED:21/02/2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.2213/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.02.2018 BEARING IN ITA NO.2213/BANG/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THESE ITAs COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned Advocate for the appellant in all these appeals has filed Memos dated 25.07.2022 seeking leave to
withdraw the appeals, stating that the dispute is settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
2. Memo is ordered accordingly. Leave granted. Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
SPS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.