Case LawHigh Court › Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank

High Court 07 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank
Date of order
07 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931 ITA.No. 460 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.66/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT: ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- M/S.SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK MALAPPURAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.460 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since issue raised is covered by our judgment in I.T.A. Nos.415and 417 of 2009 and connected cases, following the said judgment wedismiss the department appeals. Even though Standing Counselbrought to our notice that profit on sale of land and building is alsoincluded along with income from banking business, we notice from theassessment order that the amount involved is insignificant and there isno separate assessment of capital gains. Consequently we do not findany distinction in this case from other cases. Registry will attach acopy of the judgment in the above cases to form part of this judgment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge V.K.MOHANANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan