Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank
High Court
07 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank
Date of order
07 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/460/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.south Malabar Gramin Bank, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
MONDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 16TH BHADRA 1931
ITA.No. 460 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.66/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CALICUT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK
MALAPPURAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.460 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 7th day of September, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Since issue raised is covered by our judgment in I.T.A. Nos.415and 417 of 2009 and connected cases, following the said judgment wedismiss the department appeals. Even though Standing Counselbrought to our notice that profit on sale of land and building is alsoincluded along with income from banking business, we notice from theassessment order that the amount involved is insignificant and there isno separate assessment of capital gains. Consequently we do not findany distinction in this case from other cases. Registry will attach acopy of the judgment in the above cases to form part of this judgment.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
V.K.MOHANANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.