Ita/461/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri V Lakshminarayana
High Court
06 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/461/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri V Lakshminarayana
Date of order
06 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/461/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri V Lakshminarayana, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: With the said observation,the appeal is dismissed. — Sd/-JUDGESd/-|JUDGETL
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF MARCH 2015)
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND|
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA NO 461 OF 2014
BETWEEN|
1.THE COMMISSIONER ©OK INCOME TAX-IIL|CR BUILDING, QUEENS ROADBANGAIORE-5600012?THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ©OK INCOME TAX!CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (2)BANGALORE... APPELLANTS(BY SRI. EILSANMATHI, ADV.)
AND|
1.SRIV LAKSHMINARAYANANO. 968, 17 MAIN.14 MAIN, BANASHANKARI-ITSTAGE, BANGALORE-560070... RESPONDENT|(BY SRI. A SHANKAR & SRI. M. LAVA, ADVS.)
This ITA 1s filed Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act1961, arising out of order dated:05/06/2014 passed in ITANo.868/Bang/2010, for the Assessment Year 1998-99.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, |VINEET SARANJ)DRBLELIVEBERED THER KFOLLO
JUDGMENT
The revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the|
ofder passed by the Tribunal which has set aside theimposition of penalty following a judgment of this Court
passed in the case of|Commissioner of Income-Tax &
another -vs- Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory
in (2013) 359 ITR 565.Therefore, we do not see anyjustification to interfere with the impugned order and allowthis appeal. However, it is submitted that the Revenue haspreferred an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Courtagainst the said judgement of this Court and it is still pending.
In the event of the revenue succeeding in the appeal, liberty 1s
resetved to the revenue to revive this appeal.
With the said observation,the appeal is dismissed. —
Sd/-JUDGESd/-|JUDGETL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.