Ita/465/2015 Of Shri Suresh Linganagouda Patil v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/465/2015 Of Shri Suresh Linganagouda Patil v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/465/2015 Of Shri Suresh Linganagouda Patil v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.465 of 2015
BETWEEN
SHRI. SURESH LINGANAGOUDA PATIL, S/O. LINGANAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, No.428, 16 MAIN, 3 CROSS, 3 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 034.
(BY SRI K.S. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
…APPELLANT
AND
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (OSD), CIRCLE 11 (2), BANGALORE – 560 001.
(BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILLED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20.03.2015 PASSED IN INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1227/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT DATED 20.03.2015 IN ITA No.1227/Bang/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri K.S. Manjunath, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has availed the benefit under the ‘Vivad-se- Vishwas’ Scheme and therefore, the appellant does not want to prosecute the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE
mv
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.