Ita/468/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri K Prakash Shetty
High Court
06 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/468/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri K Prakash Shetty
Date of order
06 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/468/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sri K Prakash Shetty, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the event of the revenue succeeding in theappeal, liberty 1s reserved to the revenue to revive this appeal. | With the said observation,the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF MARCH 2015)
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND|
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA|
ITA NO 468 OF 2014
BETWEEN|
1.THE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-IILLINCOME TAX-IILL
CR BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE-560 O01.
2THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROK INCOME TAX!OK INCOME TAX!
CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 (3), BANGALORE.
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRL EITSANMATHI, ADV..,)
AND|
SRI K PRAKASH SHETTY.NO. 9, ALI ASKAR ROADCUNNINGHAM ROAD CROSSBANGALORE, PAN: ..
— RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A SHANKAR & SRI. M LAVA, ADVS.)
This ITA is filed Under Sec.260-A of Income Jax Act 1961,arisingOUTof.orderdated:05/06/2014passed|in.ITANo.265/Bang/2014, for the Assessment Year 2006-07.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, |VINEET SARANJ)DRBLELIVEBERED THER KFOLLO
JUDGMENT
The Revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the|otder passed by the Tribunal which has set aside the imposition ofpenalty following a judgment of this Court passed in the case ofCommissioner of Income-Tax & another -vs- Manjunatha
Cotton and Ginning Factory in (2013) 359 ITR 565.Therefore, we do not see any justification to interfere with theimpugned order and allow this appeal. However, it is submittedthat the Revenue has preferred an appeal before the Hon’bleSupreme Court against the said judgment of this Court and it isstill pending. In the event of the revenue succeeding in theappeal, liberty 1s reserved to the revenue to revive this appeal. |
With the said observation,the appeal is dismissed.
TL
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.