Ita/469/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mahathma Gandhi Vidyapeetha Trust
High Court
19 Jun 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/469/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mahathma Gandhi Vidyapeetha Trust
Date of order
19 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013, 2014-2015
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/469/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Mahathma Gandhi Vidyapeetha Trust, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitally signed by MALA KNLocation: HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:21220ITA No. 469 of 2019C/WITA No. 471 of 2019ITA No. 473 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 469 OF 2019 C/WINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 471 OF 2019INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 473 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027 (EXEMPTIONS), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (E) , CIRCLE-1 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING BENGALURU …APPELLANTS (COMMON IN ALL APPEALS)
(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I., STANDING COUNSEL)
AND:
M/S. MAHATHMA GANDHI VIDYAPEETHA TRUST SAVIGE MALLESWARA GHILLS KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU-560078
…RESPONDENT (COMMON IN ALL APPEALS)
(BY SRI. SHANKAR A. SR.ADV. FOR SRI. GURUMURTHY M.,ADVOCATE)
NC: 2023:KHC:21220ITA No. 469 of 2019C/WITA No. 471 of 2019ITA No. 473 of 2019
ITA NO. 469 OF 2019 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED C.O.NO.40/BANG/2018 IN ITA NO.2707/BANG/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT.
ITA NO. 471 OF 2019 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED IN C.O.NO.41/BANG/2018 IN ITA NO.2708/BANG/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT.
ITA NO. 473 OF 2019 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED IN C.O.NO.42/BANG/2018 IN ITA NO.2709/BANG/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
These three appeals are directed against common order dated February 15, 2019 in C.O.Nos.40 to 42/Band/2018 for Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2014-15.
2. Heard Shri.E.I.Sanmathi, learned Standing Counsel for Revenue and Shri.A.Shankar, learned Senior Advocate for respondent/assessee.
3. Shri Shankar submitted that the only question that arises for consideration in these three appeals is:
" Whether on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in allowing the exemption under Section 11 of the Act on the expenses incurred for travel outside India without appreciating that exemption under Section 11 can be allowed only if the charitable activity is performed in India and said expenses has no nexus with any charitable activity performed in India?"
According to him, the above issue is covered by the decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Bangalore -vs- Ohio University Christ College[1].
4. Shri Shankar's submission is not disputed by Shri Sanmathi. Sanmathi.
5. As prayed for by Shri.Sanmathi, the other question with regard to surplus money held by the assessee in connected is kept open.
NC: 2023:KHC:21220ITA No. 469 of 2019C/WITA No. 471 of 2019ITA No. 473 of 2019
6. In view of the above, these appeals are dismissed. The above question of law recorded in para-3 above, is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Question No.2 does not arise for consideration. Question No.1 is permitted to be urged in connected cases.
No costs.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE
KNM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.