Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula
High Court
25 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula
Date of order
25 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDI GARH
--I TA 470 2015 ( O&M)-Dat e of deci si on: 25. 07. 2016
Har yana St at e Pol l ut i on Cont r ol Boar d, Panchkul a
. . . Appel l ant
Ver sus
Deput y Commi ssi oner of I ncome Tax, Panchkul a
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CEHON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE DEEPAK SI BAL
Pr esent : -Mr . Sandeep Goyal , Advocat e,f or t he appel l ant .
Mr . Denesh Goyal , Advocat e,f or t he r espondent .* * * *S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL)
I t i s not necessar y f or t he appel l ant t o pr ess t hi sappeal i n vi ew of t he exempt i on under Sect i on 10( 23C) ( i v) oft he I ncome Tax Act , 1961 havi ng been gr ant ed i n f avour of t heappel l ant .
2.The appeal i s accor di ngl y di sposed of wi t h l i ber t y t or evi ve t he same, i f necessar y.
( S. J. VAZI FDAR)ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE
25. 07. 2016
Amodh
Whet her speaki ng/ r easonedYes/ No√Whet her r epor t abl eYes/ No√
( DEEPAK SI BAL)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.