Case LawHigh Court › Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution...

Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula

High Court 25 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula
Date of order
25 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/470/2015 Of Haryana State Pollution Control Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDI GARH --I TA 470 2015 ( O&M)-Dat e of deci si on: 25. 07. 2016 Har yana St at e Pol l ut i on Cont r ol Boar d, Panchkul a . . . Appel l ant Ver sus Deput y Commi ssi oner of I ncome Tax, Panchkul a . . . Respondent CORAM: HON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CEHON’ BLE MR. JUSTI CE DEEPAK SI BAL Pr esent : -Mr . Sandeep Goyal , Advocat e,f or t he appel l ant . Mr . Denesh Goyal , Advocat e,f or t he r espondent .* * * *S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) I t i s not necessar y f or t he appel l ant t o pr ess t hi sappeal i n vi ew of t he exempt i on under Sect i on 10( 23C) ( i v) oft he I ncome Tax Act , 1961 havi ng been gr ant ed i n f avour of t heappel l ant . 2.The appeal i s accor di ngl y di sposed of wi t h l i ber t y t or evi ve t he same, i f necessar y. ( S. J. VAZI FDAR)ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE 25. 07. 2016 Amodh Whet her speaki ng/ r easonedYes/ No√Whet her r epor t abl eYes/ No√ ( DEEPAK SI BAL)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan