Ita/47/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.national Electrical Corporation
High Court
24 Feb 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/47/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.national Electrical Corporation
Date of order
24 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/47/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.national Electrical Corporation, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: We notice from Annexure-C order that thevery same issue arose for the same year before the Tribunal in anappeal filed against Section 263 order wherein Tribunal confirmed theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930
ITA.No. 47 of 2008()
--------------------
ITA.1233/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CORPORATION,NEAR STONE BRIDGE, KOLLAM.
ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN FOR R1
SMT.S.AMINA FOR R1
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON 24/02/2009 DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal No.47 of 2008
....................................................................
Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Question raised pertains to respondent-assessee's statuts asregistered firm or as AOP. We notice from Annexure-C order that thevery same issue arose for the same year before the Tribunal in anappeal filed against Section 263 order wherein Tribunal confirmed theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax. It is conceded byassessee's counsel that the appeal filed against Annexure-C orderbefore this court was unsuccessful. Consequent upon finality ofAnnexure-C order, it was not open for the assessee to reagitate thestatus issue again. Therefore, the C.I.T.(Appeals) rightly held that thefinding of the Commissioner in Section 263 proceedings on status willbind the Assessing Officer. We do not find any jurisdiction for theTribunal to entertain an appeal on this issue in the revised proceedingsand to allow the assessee's claim that they are entitled to be assessed as
a registered firm. The appeal filed by the Revenue is therefore allowedby reversing the order of the Tribunal and by restoring the order of theC.I.T. (Appeals).
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
K.SURENDRA MOHANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.