Ita/476/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax ( Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Empire Realtech Pvt. Ltd
High Court
22 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/476/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax ( Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Empire Realtech Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/476/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax ( Central), Gurgaon v. M/S Empire Realtech Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA-476-2018(0&M)
a
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHAN DIGAR
115
ITA-476-2018(0&M)Date of decision °:22.10.201
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Gurgaon...... Appellant
VeTSUS
M/s Empire Realtech Pvt. Ltd,...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present :Mr. Kunal Sharma, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
111
1,CM;25769FCIIm2018
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowedand delay of 58 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
2.Main Case
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hasinstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of the
appeal, in case something survives therein.
ITA-476-2018(0&M)
/Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, the pending
C.M, if any also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE
22.10.2019anuradha
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.