Ita/477/2009 Of The Commissioner Oof Income Tax Cochin v. Laxmi Agencies
High Court
20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/477/2009 Of The Commissioner Oof Income Tax Cochin v. Laxmi Agencies
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/477/2009 Of The Commissioner Oof Income Tax Cochin v. Laxmi Agencies, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: At the request of counsel for the appellant appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claim eligible refund ofcourt fee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931
ITA.No. 477 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.618/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
LAXMI AGENCIES,THAMPI BUILDINGS,
M.G.ROAD,ERNAKULAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.477 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
At the request of counsel for the appellant appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claim eligible refund ofcourt fee.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue