Ita/48/2011 Of Sri Modi Subhaschandra v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/48/2011 Of Sri Modi Subhaschandra v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/48/2011 Of Sri Modi Subhaschandra v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORFINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J.,|DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo filed in the Court today, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 1/ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018.
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN)
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.48 OF JZOL
BEI|WEE
SRI MODI SUBHASCHANDRA|
PROP: SHUBHARATHNA MOTORS,P.J. EXTENSION,DAVANAGERE.
.., APPELLANI]!
(BY SRI SANKET M. YENAGI, ADVOCATE)
ANI
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.WARD-3, DAVANAGERE.
~.., RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE).
7K OK
THIS INCOME TJTAXK APPEAL IS FILED UNDSECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961)PRAYING|TO.FORMULATETHE.SUBSTANTIALQUESTION OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ANSWER|THE SAME IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 1/-9-2O1L0O IN L.1.ANO.182/BANG/2010, PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX)APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, BENCH-A, AT|ANNEXURE-A, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1999-2000.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FORFINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J.,|DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In view of the memo filed in the Court today, the
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-JUDGE|
SD/-JUDGE
KVK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue