Case LawHigh Court › Ita/48/2018 Of M/S. Trinity Arcade Priva...

Ita/48/2018 Of M/S. Trinity Arcade Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 03 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/48/2018 Of M/S. Trinity Arcade Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/48/2018 Of M/S. Trinity Arcade Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 3 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 12TH BHADRA, 1943 ITA NO. 48 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 43/2017 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/S: M/S. TRINITY ARCADE PRIVATE LIMITED35/268A, TRINITY HOUSE, OPP. YATRI NIVAS, N.H ROAD, MAMANGALAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682025 BY ADVS.MOHAN PULIKKALMANJU RAJANNARAYANAN P POTTYA.AMRUTHA VIDYADHARAN RESPONDENT/S: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOCHI, 682030 BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 03.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: I.T.A. No.48/2018 J U D G M E N T S.V. Bhatti, J. Heard Advocate Sri Mohan Pulickkal and Standing Counsel Sri Jose Joseph for parties. Memo dated 31.08.2021 filed by Adv. Mohan Pulickkal isplaced on record and accepted. ITA No.48/2018 is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGE Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAMJUDGE jjj I.T.A. No.48/2018 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P5 EXHIBIT P6 APPENDIX OF ITA 48/2018 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/02/2014. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07/12/2016 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), KOCHI. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/02/2018 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPANY PETITION NO.91/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI BENCH. TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DATED 12/11/2010 EXECUTED BY K.J. PAUL & ORS. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18/11/2010, PASSED BY THE COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHEENAI BENCH IN C.P.NO.91/2010.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan