Case LawHigh Court › Ita/483/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/483/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd

High Court 18 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/483/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd
Date of order
18 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/483/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation -3 v. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: These appeals are dismissed as untenable along with pending applications.” For the same reasons the present appeal is rejected along with pending applications.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 483/2018 & CM APPL 16029-16030/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Standing Counsel versus SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Deepak Chopra and Mr.Amit Shrivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 18.05.2018 The Revenue’s appeal questions the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter ‘ITAT’) with respect to the collection of interest on non-deposit of advance tax, in regard to the amount received by non-resident/assessee. Identical appeals for another assessment year (ITA 409-410/2018, The Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation-3 vs. Shanghai Electric Group Co.Ltd.) were rejected by this Court on 09.4.2018. The Court had then observed, as follows: “The Tribunal (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) had followed the decisions of this Court in the case of „Director of Income Tax vs. Jacabs Civil Incorporated‟, (2001) 330 ITR 578, „Director of Income Tax, International Taxation vs. GE Packaged Power Inc. and Ors.‟, (2015) 373 ITR 65 and „Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-2 vs. ZTE Corporation‟ , (2017) 392 ITR 80. Since the Tribunal followed the rulings of this Court no question of law arises. These appeals are dismissed as untenable along with pending applications.” For the same reasons the present appeal is rejected along with pending applications. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MAY 18, 2018 ndn A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan