Case LawHigh Court › Ita/484/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/484/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd

High Court 20 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/484/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd
Date of order
20 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/484/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUON THE 20 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 20138 BEFORE. THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND| THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN | INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.484 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDINGS QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.BENGALURU. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-12(4), BENGALURU. _.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND= M/S. RAJESH EXPORTS LIMITEDNO.4, BATAVIA CHAMBERS,K.R.ROAD, K.P.WEST, | BENGALURU - 560 OOL. ... RESPONDENT| THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, ARISING|OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.05.2016 PASSED IN ITA.NO.858/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, PRAYING TQ; DECIDE THE|FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER.QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE|COURT AS DEEMED FIT; SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE|ORDER DATED 31.05.2016 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX.APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’ BENCH, BENGALURU IN APPEAL|PROCEEDINGS|NO,LIANO.858/BANG/2010.DATED31.05.7016FOR)ASSESSMENT|YEAR2005-2006.(PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A) AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS)APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED|FLT. | AK AK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR|ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING: ORDER Tne learned counsel for the appellant submits that|the substantial question of law that arises for considerationin the instant appeal has been covered by the Division|Bencn|juagment.Of|tnis|CourtintneCaSe Of|COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE VS.|MOTOROLAINDIA|ELECTRONICS|PRIVATE!LIMIITED.,(2014) 46 TAXMANN.COM 167 (KARNATAKA). C 2). The submission of the learned counsel for the| appellants is placed on record. Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed. SD/- SD/- JUDGE | JUDGE JJ.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan